"The settlement of Australia/New Guinea was perhaps associated with still another big first, besides humans' first use of watercraft and first range extension since reaching Eurasia: the first mass extermination of large animal species by humans. Today, we regard Africa as the big continent of big mammals. Modern Eurasia also has many species of big mammals (though not in the manifest abundance of Africa's Serengeti Plains), such as Asia's rhinos and elephants and tigers, and Europe's moose and bears and (until classical times) lions. Australia/New Guinea today has no equally large mammals, in fact no mammal larger than 100-pound kangaroos. But Australia/New Guinea formerly had its own suite of diverse big mammals, including giant kangaroos, rhinolike marsupials called diprotodonts and reaching the size of a cow, and a marsupial 'leopard.' It also formerly had a 400-pound ostrichlike flightless bird, plus some impressively big reptiles, including a one-ton lizard, a giant python, and a land-dwelling crocodiles."Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond
Diamond continues explaining that "all of those Australian/New Guinean giants disappeared after the arrival of humans." An interesting correlation indeed, but what truly caused such mass extinctions. I've always been fascinated with paleontology; even as a 5 year old child I would sit down and watch a 3 hour long documentary about dinosaurs. So this question really resonates with me in relation to my past ventures into prehistory. I am most familiar with the demise of the large North American mammals which scientists often correlate with the arrival of human beings. However, I've never drawn comparisons with Australia/New Guinea and North America to Africa. It is true that while Africa is now considered synonymous with massive animals, other regions, particularly North America, were at once also home to massive animals
No comments:
Post a Comment